Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ; 41(8):968-969, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2096333

RESUMEN

To inform the efficient allocation of testing resources, we evaluated the characteristics of those tested for COVID-19 to determine predictors of a positive test. Recent travel and exposure to a confirmed case were both highly predictive of positive testing. Symptom-based screening strategies alone may be inadequate to control the ongoing pandemic.

6.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(12): 1375-1377, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-989622

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Presently, evidence guiding clinicians on the optimal approach to safely screen patients for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to a nonemergent hospital procedure is scarce. In this report, we describe our experience in screening for SARS-CoV-2 prior to semiurgent and urgent hospital procedures. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: A single tertiary-care medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Our study cohort included patients ≥18 years of age who had semiurgent or urgent hospital procedures or surgeries. METHODS: Overall, 625 patients were screened for SARS-CoV-2 using a combination of phone questionnaire (7 days prior to the anticipated procedure), RT-PCR and chest computed tomography (CT) between March 1, 2020, and April 30, 2020. RESULTS: Of the 625 patients, 520 scans (83.2%) were interpreted as normal; 1 (0.16%) had typical features of COVID-19; 18 scans (2.88%) had indeterminate features of COVID-19; and 86 (13.76%) had atypical features of COVID-19. In total, 640 RT-PCRs were performed, with 1 positive result (0.15%) in a patient with a CT scan that yielded an atypical finding. Of the 18 patients with chest CTs categorized as indeterminate, 5 underwent repeat negative RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab 1 week after their initial swab. Also, 1 patient with a chest CT categorized as typical had a follow-up repeat negative RT-PCR, indicating that the chest CT was likely a false positive. After surgery, none of the patients developed signs or symptoms suspicious of COVID-19 that would indicate the need for a repeated RT-PCR or CT scan. CONCLUSION: In our experience, chest CT scanning did not prove provide valuable information in detecting asymptomatic cases of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) in our low-prevalence population.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/métodos , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Minnesota/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/etiología , Administración de la Seguridad , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/organización & administración , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA